Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 19:10:46 -0700
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030824125536.00b61a60@mail.horizon.bc.ca> <5.1.1.6.0.20030824153018.01ad4cc0@mail.horizon.bc.ca>

David

The 90mm Elmarit was my preferred portrait lens until it was stolen.
But just today I found a MINT collapsible 90mm Elmar at an estate
sale, along with a few Leica goodies. I have no experience with that
lens, but it will have to do.

Jerry

David Young wrote:

> Jerry said:
>
> >I have found that the Elmarit and Tele Elmarit are quite different in
> >their performance at f2.8, with the Elmarit winning. These of course, are
> >with the M lenses.  I know that you prefer the R, but I have no experience
> >with the R Elmarit.
>
> Me neither.  I had the Tele-Elmarit-M  (skinny or 2nd version on a CL) and
> found it *very* satisfactory - even wide open.  I have no experience with
> the 90 Elmarit-M, so I cannot draw any distinctions.
>
> My only comment was that Slobodan had said he felt the T-E was "unusable"
> at f2.8.  With this, I do not agree.  :)
>
> ----------
>
> David Young,     | égalité, liberté,
> Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
>
> Website at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
In reply to: Message from David Young <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> ([Leica] Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
Message from David Young <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> ([Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)