Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] E6@home [was: Rant: another screw up by New Lab...
From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:09:54 +1000

I have used Agfa's 3 step with no problem at all for a few years now, 
but the work was not "critical" I'd admit

Cheers
On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 04:18 Australia/Melbourne, Jim Hemenway 
wrote:

> Get the Kodak single use 6 step, I had nothing but trouble with the 
> 3(4) step.
>
> Rolfe Tessem wrote:
>
>> Roy Zartarian wrote:
>>> That's pretty much the process in a nutshell except that you have to 
>>> pour and drain each step of the chemistry at the proper time, a task 
>>> facilitated by the use of the correct Lift for the processor.  Other 
>>> items you might consider acquiring are a good mercury thermometer (I 
>>> got mine from Edmund Scientific) to verify solution temperatures,  
>>> appropriately graduated measuring cylinders (same source) if you 
>>> decide to mix small batches of chemistry from a 5 liter 6-step kit, 
>>> and a tupperware or Rubbermaid container to hold the stabilizer or 
>>> final rinse since that stuff shouldn't be used on plastic reels.
>>>
>>> I've been doing my own E-6 for about 4 years now with a CPE-2 and 
>>> now go to a lab only if I'm really at a loss for time.
>>>
>>> Roy
>> Roy,
>> Do you use the 3 step or the 6 step kit? If you've used both, is 
>> there still any noticeable advantage to the 6 step version?
>> Rolfe
>
> -- 
>
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
Alastair

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html