Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark Aren't these "goggles" supposed to be for close-ups only, sort of like a Dual Range Elmar f4, if it were ever to be. I assume that the goggles would be removable (like the DR Summicron) for normal work Jerry Mark Rabiner wrote: > I'm not buying (believing) the "90 F4 with goggles" rumor because if > they went f4 it would be for compactness and they would not want the > goggles which would ruin that. Some thought the 2.8 135 was ruined by > the goggles. If they only had that 1.2 screw in thing for the eyepiece > those days. > > Also they WOULD need the goggles for extra high speed lenses for more > accuracy this is the opposite case. > > No this is another stupid rumor. I guess you've got this in writing so > somebodies going to say "i told you so" and i think I'm right and I've > been pretty lucky so far. > > Mark Rabiner > Portland, Oregon USA > http://www.rabinergroup.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html