Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] DigiBack webpage updated, but still not for the look, sigh
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:03:02 -0400

Well it's not so much that it's boring Gergor, in that it is really
getting pretty silly. Many of us would love a digital camera that would
use M lenses, but your Photoshop exercise isn't bringing it any closer -
unless of course you are actually planning to produce it. So while it
was fun to see this exercise when it was first posted, adding more and
more too it really doesn’t carry it any further, does it? Because Leica
certainly has enough of an engineering and design staff to come up with
something as basic as you're presenting here.

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Grégoire
Vandenschrick
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 4:30 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] DigiBack webpage updated, but still not for the
look, sigh


I'm sorry Mr Colen,

I'dont quite catch the meaning of your sentence. do you mean the webpage
is slow, or do you mean enough now please with this boring subject, or
something else?

My english is not my mothertongue, so please explain

Gregoire


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] DigiBack webpage updated, but still not for the
look, sigh


> This is getting really old - slowly.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Grégoire

> Vandenschrick
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] DigiBack webpage updated, but still not for the look,

> sigh
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I added two pages, one with technical data of the digiback ,an other 
> one explaining a little bit how could the digiback and the leica-M 
> body exchange information, without having the Leica-M too much 
> modified.
>
> here for the links:
>
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/Technical%20data.htm
> If you read the Leica D-LUX brochure, you will recognize some stuff...
>
> and
>
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/bodybacktalk.htm
> I think about this yesterday eve, and wanted to expose it, this is 
> actually easier than first thought
>
> have a "good" surf
>
> ps,
>
> I currently look very closely to an alternative html wysiwyg 
> production soft, to be more compliant with other systems. I would have

> to redo all the work, but well, this is so. any suggestion, given I 
> unfortunately
> (;-)) work under Win XP home and IE 6.0 to check the results.
>
> Best regards to all
>
> Grégoire Vandenschrick
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 18/09/2003
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- ---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 18/09/2003

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] DigiBack webpage updated, but still not for the look, sigh)