Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 04:14 PM 10/6/03 -0400, bdcolen wrote: >I know of no one who defended Bill Clinton's actions - the only question >about his behavior was whether it rose to the level of being an >impeachable offense. BD No. Bill Clinton was NOT impeached for having had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. He was indicted for TELLING FALSEHOODS about it. He lied, and was impeached, and the Senate refused to remove him. (Which, in the end, would have allowed the AlGorithm to run as an incumbent in 2000 but, then, I suspect that your common sense comprehends what a disaster Gore would have been to our national governance.) Clinton's problem was not with his womanizing but with his HONESTY. He was a flagrant liar. By the way, you have opined, over the years, that "lawyers lie when they flap their lips". If this be true, then Bill Clinton, Gray Davis, and a bunch of others would be damned from the start. Marc msmall@infionline.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir! - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html