Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]By taking away a reference to an unocntorversial principle, I can get these letters through to the LUG. Daniel - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:50:06 +0100 (MET) From: Daniel Ridings <danielr@ulrik.uio.no> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else) I still haven't found the questions, but here is the report on the US for 2003 and I assume that it lies behind the ranking. http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=6228 Daniel On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, sam wrote: > Thank my luck stars, I've found someone in the know. John, again, who > are these people? Do they have names? Do you know what questions they > ask? Please inform me. > > Merely knowing that they are "well known" is not much information. > > Sam S > > > > John Collier wrote: > > > Your ignorance of a well known press organization does not count as > > valid criticism. > > > > John Collier > > > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 02:21 PM, sam wrote: > > > >> > >> Tim Atherton wrote: > >> > >> > http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=4118 > >> > -- > >> > >> > >> No, no, no! There is nothing of substance there. > >> > >> "The questionnaire was sent to people with a real knowledge of the > >> press freedom situation in one or more countries, such as local > >> journalists or foreign correspondents living in the country, > >> researchers, legal experts, specialists on a region and the > >> researchers of the Reporters Without Borders International Secretariat." > >> > >> Again, who the hell are these people? > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html