Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:16:49 -0500
References: <20031127021637.GF4107@panix.com> <BBEAB264.13A2A%telyt@earthlink.net>

thanks so much for the reply...  what makes an R-only bayonet
versus one which works with the leicaflexes?

- -rei

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:41:25PM -0800, Doug Herr wrote:
> on 11/26/03 6:16 PM, Rei Shinozuka at shino@panix.com wrote:
> 
> > what versions of the 50 summilux work on the SL2?  sartorius
> > mentions that the 2nd version of the 50 summiluzx 78-86 works with
> > the SL SLR2 and Rs but the 3rd version 89-98 is only for the R.
> > 
> > how does one tell if an R lens works with an SL2?  i had always
> > thought it what those mysterious "cams"
> > 
> > thx,
> > 
> > 
> > -rei
> 
> All versions of the 50mm Summicron-R can be made to work on the SL2.  ROM
> lenses including the current version must be converted to 3-cam before they
> can be used.  The conversion costs about $200.
> 
> I don't know about sartorius but if the lens only has the 3rd cam it might
> also have the R-only bayonet which must either be machined to fit the SL2 or
> replaced with the appropriate mount.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- -- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)
In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)
Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)