Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:26:59 -0800
References: <20031127021637.GF4107@panix.com> <BBEAB264.13A2A%telyt@earthlink.net> <20031127071649.GA21104@panix.com>
 
The first two of the three cams are missing.

On Nov 26, 2003, at 11:16 PM, Rei Shinozuka wrote:

> thanks so much for the reply...  what makes an R-only bayonet
> versus one which works with the leicaflexes?
Eric
Carlsbad, CA

Associate not with evil men, lest you increase their number. - George 
Herbert

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)
Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] 50 summilux for an SL2)