Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dean wrote: > > Hello. > > I have never sent a post here, but have been lurking for a while. > > Quite a sensitive issue this digital business, it seems. Anyway, my friend, > who is fluent in Japanese, posted this on another list a while back. I > thought I might quote him here, as some might find this interesting. > > "There was an interesting artile on this in a recent issue of Asahi Camera. > I think I've mentioned it before. The general judgement was that Leica was > providing quite different image-processing software, and that if you liked > the result (examples shown) it was definitely worth the difference in > price. The pictures did look rather different." > > Didn't see the mag myself, and I understand that what is quoted above pretty > much covers everything that was said about the difference (i.e. that's all > there is on this at this time). > > Hope this was in some way useful (more virtual wheat to be ground in the > speculation mill?). > > Sooner, > Dean Johnston > > .. As was the case with the DIGILUX ONE as is I believe it for the TWO. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html