Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:53:16 -0800
References: <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com>

At 6:10 PM -0800 12/4/03, Eric Welch wrote:
>Phase one can't match Photoshop for control.
>
>But I was talking about Photoshop Elements. A great program, but it 
>can't handle RAW files for one thing. It's not for the pre-press 
>world I'm in.
>
>Phase-One might be good, but I prefer to process my photos with the 
>best out there. And that's Photoshop 8. Let the sensor dump the data 
>onto the CF card with no processing at all.

That's not possible. All cameras do some processing.

>On Dec 4, 2003, at 6:50 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>>At this point in time the PhaseOne alledgedly has the best software 
>>for handling 'raw' files, regardless of camera. In other words if 
>>you buy your Canon 10D, you're going to want to spend the 
>>additional $500 bucks for PhaseOne's software.
>
>Eric Welch
>Carlsbad, CA
>http://www.jphotog.com
>
>"There exists a limit to the force even the most powerful may apply 
>without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true 
>artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law 
>cannot be a tool of vengeance, never a hostage, nor a mortification 
>against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any 
>individual and escape the consequences."
>--  Frank Herbert
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Reply from "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))