Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 2003-12-05 mark@rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) thoughtfully wrote: >"Raw seems less raw than Nikons NEF which is their Raw. And in which you >can adjust the white point and EV's as if you were just taking the >picture. Only you are at your computer dealing with an image which you'd >taken in the past. To me that's pretty amazing. And a bummer Photoshop >can't save it back into that format. But that defeats the entire purpose, doesn't it? After you have processed a file's RAW image in photoshop it's not RAW any more - all the work of assembling the camera's pixel data has been done to show it to you. Taking that image apart again to simulate what the camera's chip has output would create artifacts and gain you nothing. I think. Adam - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html