Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]yup, a bit like serendipity in science...what is ultimately MOST important is what you LEAST expect, therefore not predictable even by consensus of "experts"....Steve > If everyone here can agree on a definition of what is art, the > definition is probably not worth the 0s and 1s with which it's written. > ;-) > You're right! > > Form, method, technique... all the same to me. > > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > > Peterson Arthur G NSSC wrote: > > > Reading Phong's comment ("Art is an expression of our > feelings, > > among other things") and Jim's reply ("Art is the expression of an > > emotion through a technique"), one might at first prefer to say, "Art > > is the expression of emotion through a form"---whether that form were > > an arrangement of words in a poem or a novel, an arrangement of light > > and color in a picture, or an arrangement of sounds in a symphony or a > > > sonata. But perhaps that definition should be carried a step further, > > > addressing strictly what art is, without reference to what it > > (supposedly) expresses. Archibald MacLeish ended his poem "Ars > > Poetica" with the apt lines, "A poem should not mean / But be" > > [emphasis added]; and as Igor Stravinsky once explained, "Music can > > express nothing---that is my conviction---it can express only itself." > > > So one might say, "A work of art is an object that expresses itself > > through its form." > > > > Art Peterson > > Alexandria, Virginia > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Hemenway [mailto:Jim@hemenway.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:16 AM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: [Leica] On making Art > > > > Hi Phong: > > > > > Art is an expression of our feelings, among other > things. < > > > > Okay so far as it goes, but consider this definition: > > > > Art is the expression of an emotion through a technique. > > > > Most would say, -through a valid technique. But what is > valid to > > one > > person may not be to another. The oil coloring > described in Tina's > > post > > must have been valid to the instructor but surely wasn't > to Tina. > > > > The technique can be drawing and painting, sculpture, > photography, > > etc., > > but it can also be things such as dance, poetry, weaving > and in some > > cases being silly... as in a "live" installation. > > > > What makes any of it great art is acceptance as such, by > a broad > > range > > of people. > > > > Art is really "a la carte", pick what you like, try > something new, > > and/or complain about everything else... which is what > we've > > been doing. > > > > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > > > > > > > Phong wrote: > > > > > > Art is an expression of our feelings, among other > things. The only > > > thing I ask is that such expression be genuine (Nan > > Goldin, e.g.). > > > If such feelings is about our libido, ego, > > self-indulgence, etc. > > > should there be no place for them in art ? Should art > be > > only > > > about "good", acceptable feelings ? And I expect much > of > > art, > > > genuine art, to be incoherent, sometimes even > > incomprehensible. > > > > > > There is art, and there is the business of art. If > the > > public is > > > stupid enough to pay for the art, don't blame only the > > artist. > > > And I don't think artists would treat you as ignorant > > Philistine > > > just because you don't like their art. Just don't put > > down something > > > you don't understand. You put them down, or they > think > > you might put > > > them down, and they'll treat you as ignorant > Philistine. > > > > > > In any case, I am always suspect of successful > > professional artists, > > > going back to da Vinci. I can respect and admire > their > > talent, > > > but their art, as an genuine expression, is suspect. > > Whose art > > > is it anyway ? But hey, one has to make a living, a > good > > one if > > > possible. > > > > > > Just my narrow view on art, > > > > > > - Phong > > > > > > Whose art is it anyway ? Of course, at some point, > the > > viewer > > > assumes the work of art as an expression of his or her > > feelings too. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.548 / Virus Database: 341 - Release Date: 12/5/03 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html