Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Adam, I don't know if you read the article, however it did mention a female ejaculation possibility, however the poartner backed out. I can see how you can say it is male-centric, however I don't see why you would consider rejecting art based on it being male-centric (not just this piece but all pieces of art) There is plenty of female centric art - should that be rejected as well because it does not include male content? Adrian Adam Bridge wrote > Actually this is an example of male-centric art at its worst. It > completely > leaves out the lesbian community and thus should be rejected and > chastised in > the strongest possible terms. > > AB > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html