Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Leo W Wesson <lwwesson@pier1.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:37:40 -0600
References: <b02000301-1031-90689B922C0B11D8AB91000393D465D8@[10.0.1.3]>

http://www.axelraben.com/sahihi/default.htm

Sorry to bring up this again but have you checked out the armpit 
series?  Or the drug series?
I am pretty open minded but I have to say: Gee Whiz, try something 
without shock value!

Leo

On Dec 11, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:

> On 2003-12-11 imagist@imagist.cnc.net (George Lottermoser) 
> thoughtfully wrote:
>
>> They're not portraits of an intimate, inherently sexual act.
>> They're portraits of individuals, exposed a moment after an 
>> inherently sexual
>> act.
>
> Actually this is an example of male-centric art at its worst. It 
> completely
> leaves out the lesbian community and thus should be rejected and 
> chastised in
> the strongest possible terms.
>
> AB
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (RE: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)