Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:15:33 +0100
References: <3FDD4CA5.8F1FB1BA@chello.nl> <187201c3c322$9471b490$0200a8c0@Desk>
 
Bob,

No, the 35 Summilux is not prone to vignetting. I guess it just happened
on these shots. The light was in fact awful, a really depressing grey
and dark day.

Nathan

robertmeier@usjet.net wrote:
> 
> Nathan,
> 
> There is a fair amount of vignetting in these.  Is that normal with this
> lens?
> 
> Bob
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Reply from robertmeier@usjet.net (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
 In reply to: Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from robertmeier@usjet.net (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)