Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Conflict of Interest
From: "Jem Kime" <jem.kime@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:11:51 -0000
References: <000001c3c62a$28331bb0$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4> <49347.12.225.62.37.1071903705.squirrel@www.jphotog.com> <8235EA98-3310-11D8-9134-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
 
John,
Having been off-list for around a year I must admit it was bit of a surprise
to find some LUGgers still chewing the fat on this one.
Jem

- ----- Original Message ----- 
Subject: Re: [Leica] Conflict of Interest


> The whole Puts/Leica conflict of interest has been hashed to death
> around here so my only comment is to say I disagree.
>
> John Collier
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] RE: Miserable Failure)
Message from eric@jphotog.com ([Leica] Conflict of Interest)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Conflict of Interest)