Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I've always preferred the larger size of my M6 over the smaller IIIC that I used to have, so perhaps the size is a subjective thing. Certainly the Digilux price is high but apart from the electronic viewfinder I like the design. However for someone shooting in Raw mode I can't see any reason to go for the Leica offering over the cheaper Panasonic. The major claimed difference between the Panasonic LS5 and the Digilux I was the difference in firmware, I would have thought this would be irrelevant if shooting Raw. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: 04 January 2004 20:23 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC BTW - My point isn't to say that this proves something great about the E-1...It's to point out what a monstrosity the DigiII is given that it's a fixed lens point-and-shoot.....;-) - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html