Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don't forget too that you are paying $1850 for a point-and-shoot with a top ISO of only 400 - compared to 1600 and 3200 with the DSLRs...granted that there's allot of noise at those higher isos, but there is with high speed film as well...and at 800 noise isn't an issue with the Canon DSLRs..... - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve Unsworth Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 3:45 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC I've always preferred the larger size of my M6 over the smaller IIIC that I used to have, so perhaps the size is a subjective thing. Certainly the Digilux price is high but apart from the electronic viewfinder I like the design. However for someone shooting in Raw mode I can't see any reason to go for the Leica offering over the cheaper Panasonic. The major claimed difference between the Panasonic LS5 and the Digilux I was the difference in firmware, I would have thought this would be irrelevant if shooting Raw. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: 04 January 2004 20:23 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC BTW - My point isn't to say that this proves something great about the E-1...It's to point out what a monstrosity the DigiII is given that it's a fixed lens point-and-shoot.....;-) - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html