Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The question isn't whether the "print" is worthy of preserving - the question is whether the image that's printed is worthy of preserving. ;-) I'll take the lousiest HCB print any day over the best master print of a mundane image by some John Doe who's known for his glorious prints. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of sam Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:44 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: [LargeFormat] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 For Campaign Coverage Beth Keiser has become a minor hero of mine. Reminds me of the fellow who wondered aloud during an aggressive "are digital prints archival" debate, how many of the people involved in the debate could produce even one print that is worthy of lasting; and then suggested that non-archival prints might well be a bessing for furture peoples. Sam S animal wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Hemenway" <Jim@hemenway.com> > To: "Large Format Group" <largeformat@f32.net>; "BigNeg Group" > <bigneg@topica.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:22 PM > Subject: [LargeFormat] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 For Campaign Coverage > > > > http://www.pdnonline.com/photodistrictnews/headlines/article_display.j > sp?vnu_content_id=2071563 > >>Jim - http://www.hemenway.com >> >> - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html