Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Recent PAWs
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:49:02 -0600
References: <026801c3f021$9c3f7fa0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <001901c3f054$55d44680$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <000301c3f05a$a5b548b0$ef279d18@jimyuk06mzqas1>

Jim:

>http://members.rogers.com/jmcdesigns/jamesstreet/PAW/01-23-2004.htm
>
>http://members.rogers.com/jmcdesigns/jamesstreet/PAW/01-30-2004.htm
>
>http://members.rogers.com/jmcdesigns/jamesstreet/PAW/02-09-2004.htm

The last one doesn't do anything for me.  The lost highlights on the leaves
are distracting.

The first two are great!  Love the tones on the first one, as well as the
lighting on Rebecca's face.  Love the composition of the kids in the 2nd
one--Sliding.  It does appears to have a bit of slight vignetting, though.


Eric
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: Re: [Leica] Re: Digital M)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: Re: [Leica] Re: Digital M)
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> ([Leica] Recent PAWs)