Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Technically, 'noticeable' is more correct, as you can never prove there is
no noise as this depends on the noise floor of the measuring device, which
will always limit the results. Sorta like DOF, its relative to your
standard at the time of measurement.
"B. D. Colen"
<bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent by: cc:
owner-leica-users@mejac.palo Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital Bessa, NOT
-alto.ca.us
02/17/2004 12:07 PM
Please respond to
leica-users
Any noise that is "noticeable?" That's not the same as "doesn't produce
any noise."
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Félix
López de Maturana
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:54 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE:[Leica] Digital Bessa, NOT
>The Digilux 2 doesn't show any "noise" at 400 that is noticeable
It's hard to believe if it has such small sensor. IMHO the best quality
of this camera it's his Leica zoom and it's necessary to test it deeply
before have any founded opinion. Unless someone buy anything with the
red dot.
Felix
PS If productivity is considered the new Nikon D70 with a supposed very
good 18-70 zoom is a better choice.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html