Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: M3 1/2
From: tom_mlist at ftp.kumasite.com (Tom Kumagai)
Date: Sun Apr 4 05:09:39 2004
References: <000a01c41944$ab44cd60$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net><406E59CF.9070006@aol.com> <20040403125905.GB15542@panix.com><20040403141146.GA450@panix.com><406F810E.477C8D93@hale-pohaku.com><20040404073016.GB606@panix.com> <20040404074238.GA4725@panix.com>
Shinozuka-san
Thats a funny way to put it even if u dont mean to *implicate*.
Easier to choose what to purchase from online catalogs if they
come up with similar expressions. :)
--
Tom(oyuki) Kumagai
http://www.kumasite.com/
Rei Shinozuka said:
>> so it is rather halfway between an M3 and M4.
> no implication that it is 116.667% of an M3, nor
> 87.5% of an M4, nor 50% of an M7 ... and so on....
>
> -rei
In reply to:
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from gwpics at aol.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)