Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lea, I appreciated your criticism because they appeared to very serious and business-minded ... professional. I found that refreshing. The shots you criticize ... I didn't like them either, but for different reasons. The cluttered shot (saddle, ladder, etc) just seemed to out of place. Sexist shots don't bother me per se ... we see so many of them that we just ho-hum. The same with the young girl. I would have preferred her in a more natural, rather than studio environment. I would feel uncomfortable taking shots like that. I like to interact with my subjects and that would be discomforting in this case. If that was a young woman's response to an interaction with me ... it wouldn't work. For me, portraits are the result of an interaction between the subject and the photographer where the photographer tries to bring out something of essence in the subject. But I'm just a hack. Best, Daniel On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, lea wrote: > Sonny, > > I agree with you that it appears to be a successful (if very > discombobulated IMO) portrait and while there is certainly room in the > world for this type of work, I just wouldn't put it in the portfolio. > The purpose of a portfolio is to generate new business. > > 99% of who contacts me about photo shoots are women. The two women > who've responded to this indicate it should be dumped. I've had several > women call and ask if I do lingere-type shots and I don't...simply > because I don't feel qualified. If customers like your style, they'll > ask you to do anything. > > If Phong wants to do that type of photography, more power to him and to > his subjects because he obviously has good lighting skills and can do > the work. Me, I'll stick with little kids and families and weddings and > pets and everyone keeps their clothing on! Except pregnant women who > wish to show off their changing bodies. There is a market for > everything............ > > Lea > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <SonC@aol.com> > To: <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Portfolio Review > > > > Lea and Tina: > > As I am from Louisiana, I am sure many will misconstrue my remarks, > but here > > goes: > > I left that picture out of my choices for the portfolio because > style-wise, > > it just didn't fit. > > That said, it obviously didn't bother the subject, as she seemed to > have > > fun. So, IMO, it was a successful portrait. Portraits are > different than > > other types of photography. They have to appeal to the subject > first. All other > > viewers, including other women are secondary to the purpose. > > In these parts, a portrait portfolio including several similar shots > would > > sell a number of jobs for Phong. > > Girls here drive dually pickup trucks with diesel engines, go to > rodeos, > > cook for their men and kick their men's butts if they mess around. > > Sonny > > In a message dated 4/6/2004 9:39:02 AM Central Standard Time, > > images@InfoAve.Net writes: > > > > >Phong, > > >Your use of light is excellent; you've got some great shadow things > > >happening in many of your images. > > >Lea > > > > I agree with everything Lea said - especially about > > > http://www.phongdoan.com/Photography/PortraitPortfolio/12_crw_4833p.htm > > > > >From 2 LUG women! > > Tina > > > > Regards, > > > > Sonny > > _http://www.sonc.com_ (http://www.sonc.com/) > > > > "You can't always get what you want, but sometimes, if you try, you > can get > > what you need" The Rolling Stones > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >