Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason
From: lea at whinydogpress.com (lea)
Date: Wed Apr 14 18:17:19 2004
References: <12f601c42283$4e866ff0$ce771a41@leaetrg64tja2w> <407DE2A6.4060702@cox.net>

 > The second shot was taken at 48 weeks
>
> nope...please recalculate....it just seemed that long.

My bad...should have read 38 weeks. Good Lord, she would have come
undone if she'd gone 48 weeks! That extra 2 weeks about did her in as it
was!

Lea

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason


>
>
> lea wrote:
>
> > Last April my little and only sister told me she and her husband
were
> > expecting (their first) and I asked if I might chronicle her
pregnancy
> > via photographs. She was delighted and we got down to business.
> >
> > Two days after telling me, Shannon and Jason came to my studio and
we
> > began photographing. I shot my sister every month up until 45 weeks
>
> how long was this pregnancy ??   :-)
>   then
> > I began photographing her every week until she delivered...she went
2
> > weeks over (poor dear). This work was done entirely with my Leica
in
> > black and white (except for December which they requested to have in
> > color so I used digital) in an assortment of places...the studio,
the
> > baby's nursery, their home, outside...wherever the mood struck us to
go.
> > Four of the sessions included Jason, the bulk of them did not. Some
of
> > the work was nude, most was not. It is an amazing journal of her
growth
> > and body change ending in the arrival of Rachel Diane.
> >
> > To see a small sample of the images from this series click here...
> > http://www.whinydogpress.com/familyi.html
> > The first shot was taken 2 days after they found out she was
pregnant
> > The second shot was taken at 48 weeks
>
> nope...please recalculate....it just seemed that long.
>
> > The third shot was taken when Rachel was 5 days old.
> >
>
> these  three make a wonderful series....
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>



In reply to: Message from lea at whinydogpress.com (lea) ([Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason)