Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The sad state of leica cameras
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Mon Apr 26 07:11:24 2004
 
Number 2 is a bounder.
S. Dimitrov

> From: Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:40:40 -0400
> To: "'lug@leica-users.org'" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] The sad state of leica cameras
> 
> The whole mall before me, thousands upon thousands of people, and only three
> leicas in my survey:
> 
> http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/temp/2004/leica1.jpg
> http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/temp/2004/leica2.jpg
> http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/temp/2004/leica3.jpg
> 
> What gives people? HUH? What GIVES?
> 
> Kc
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] The sad state of leica cameras)
 In reply to: Message from KCassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] The sad state of leica cameras)