Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Staged photos
From: PetersonAG at NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL (Peterson Arthur G NSSC)
Date: Wed May 12 07:07:36 2004

I'd suggest it's just a matter of custom and usage.  As it happens, such
photos have generally tended not to be set up, but rather to be candid, and
so we've come to expect that with photography, and so when---unusually---a
photo is set up, or staged, we tend to be "tricked" by it, and we feel
misled, and so we may criticize the photo as a "fake."  Movies, on the other
hand, and as it happens, have generally tended to be staged, scripted,
planned, rehearsed, and so when we see a movie, we just assume---unless the
label "Documentary" were conspicuously applied to it---that it was indeed
set up, and no one feels tricked by it or misled in the least bit.

Art Peterson
Alexandria, Virginia


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hardy Carter [mailto:paul@paulhardycarter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:46
To: lug list
Subject: [Leica] Staged photos


Do you guys feel the same about Doisneau's Kiss at the Hotel de Ville, which
was famously a set-up. (Why do people use the word "fake" I wonder?)

I remember a lot of people were outraged at the time that the set-up was
confirmed, but it doesn't make any difference to me. It's still a great
photo that captures a moment.

P.
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information