Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Same here. I am open to all suggestions except for Technical Pan. It is too damned expensive and too damned fragile. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Richard F. Man Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 4:01 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT It is the cart before the horse unless you don't have a film preference yet :-) I am in that situation. At 01:49 PM 5/17/2004, B. D. Colen wrote: >Not to start a flame war, but it seems to be this is letting the cart >decide where the horse should pull it. If one prefers Tri-X to Delta >400, figure out how best to scan it, don't just switch films because the >other "scans better." I have to say, and I think have before, that I >don't get the complaints about scanning tri-x..... // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard@imagecraft.com)