Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: observations about the "More than 1 Ms" thread (Vol 27, Issue 238)
From: ahgraves at prodigy.net (Allen Graves)
Date: Sun May 23 06:22:20 2004
References: <200405230245.i4N2jCRn099427@server1.waverley.reid.org>
 
The Bi-Summilux would certainly be big!     ;-)

Allen




>On Sat, 22 May 2004 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT), lug-request@leica-users.org quoth
>unto the boundless Ether...
>>the M lens I'd really like would be a 35-50-90 Tri-Elmar (or a 35-50-75-90
>Quad-Elmar),
>
>I'd really like a Bi-Summicron (35-90/2) or even a Bi-Summilux (35-75/1.4)!
>
>Hey, If you are gonna dream, dream big. :)
>Carpe Luminem,
>Michael Eric Berube
>GoodPhotos.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from MEB at GoodPhotos.com (Michael E. Berube) ([Leica] Re: observations about the "More than 1 Ms" thread (Vol 27, Issue 238))