Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FS: Noctilux
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Fri May 28 12:00:03 2004

True. If you're not comfortable with a piece of equipment, it's not
going to work for you in the long run.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Feli di Giorgio
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: Noctilux


On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 11:43, B. D. Colen wrote:
> Why, oh why, don't most people get the fact that the Noctilux is a 
> special purpose lens. It is NOT a "standard" lens, as are most 50s. It

> is designed for one thing - capturing images when nothing else will 
> capture them. It's big; it's bulky; it's heavy; it doesn't focus close

> enough; it has weird bokeh; and it has non-existent depth of field. 
> But as Ted and some other folks have demonstrated, but there is no 
> light, the Noctilux supplies it. So if you find that you regularly 
> miss shots because you need that extra stop, it makes great sense. But

> if you don't shoot that way, a Summicron, Summilux - or Nocton - makes

> much more sense.
> 
> B. D.

Well, I DID need a super high speed lens that will shoot in no light 
and I still look at my Noct negatives and think the world of that piece 
of glass. I just couldn't deal with the ergonomics of it and like Doug
Herr said that can be a deal breaker.


Feli


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] FS: Noctilux)