Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Analog v. Digital
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Wed Jul 14 07:50:50 2004
References: <004e01c469b1$6f3a0de0$35b1fea9@ccapr.com>
 
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:47:06 -0400, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> 
wrote:
> But someone, at some point, decided that "electronic" was pass? and
> oh-so-50s, and that "digital" was a more marketable term, and, besides,
> it was one people could come to understand in terms of watches and
> clocks - digital is modern and up-to-date, analogue is old-fashioned and
> stodgy.
> 
> JustMHO.... :-)


Oh B.D., you're just a stodgy old man! :)
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Analog v. Digital)
 In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Analog v. Digital)