Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: Babe Magnet: WAS Summilux Asph arrives: The sequel
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri Jul 23 12:31:14 2004
References: <20040723190134.60264.qmail@web50508.mail.yahoo.com>

I think it was the body itself. A true work of art, although I sold it 
in the end because it just was not convenient in use. As for the lens, 
let me quote my brother-in-law: size doesn't matter as long as it is 
crazy ;-)

Nathan

Emanuel Lowi wrote:

> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
> 
>>Absolutely! I once owned a IIIf with collapsible
>>Summicron, and it was 
>>an absolute magnet! I had to fight off attractive
>>females all the time ;-)
>>
> 
> 
> Do you think it was the IIIf, with its multiple knobs,
> which did it? Or was it the short but stout-hearted
> collapsible Summicron?
> 
> ;-)
> 
> Emanuel Lowi
> Montreal
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 30 868 671
General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com



Replies: Reply from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] leica R-E question)
In reply to: Message from lowiemanuel at yahoo.ca (Emanuel Lowi) ([Leica] re: Babe Magnet: WAS Summilux Asph arrives: The sequel)