Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Shakleton Photos Faked
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Sun Aug 22 13:41:55 2004
References: <200408221622.i7MGLA4t060068@server1.waverley.reid.org>

And even in more recent times, W. Eugene Smith was known to alter some of
his photos for artistic sense.   And many of his photo essay's were setups.
 But the bottom line was that he was not depicting a lie.  His photos
showed Doctor Schweitzer doing what he actually did in real life, Smith
just wanted the photos to look a bit better.

-dan c.

At 02:20 PM 22-08-04 -0400, Emanuel Lowi wrote:
>Remember too that there was a tradition of photo
>humbuggery established before the days of yellow
>journalism. There were pictures haunted with ghosts &
>people posed with props or dressed up in strangers
>clothes, for effect.  
>
>Exposure times were long and the gear cumbersome --
>none of this zippy whiz-bang digital ease, eh ;-) 
>
>So they made sure the picture looked "right," even
>though it was "wrong." Plus ?a change...
>
>Emanuel Lowi
>Montreal
>
> 
>
>______________________________________________________________________ 
>Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Shakleton Photos Faked)
Reply from kitmc at vuelux.com (Kit McChesney | Vuelux) ([Leica] Re: Shakleton Photos Faked)
In reply to: Message from lowiemanuel at yahoo.ca (Emanuel Lowi) ([Leica] Re: Shakleton Photos Faked)