Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lenses without digital Bodies, Anyone?
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Tue Aug 31 13:43:31 2004
References: <00a001c48f95$c9fbadb0$6501a8c0@ccapr.com>

On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:04, B. D. Colen wrote:
> Well it's a Nikon description, but the images suggest my memory hasn't
> totally gone to hell.:-) Thanks, Feli -

Well, here's what I have read elsewhere. The 105/2.5 is very, very good. 
Not as good as a 2.8/100 APO or 2.8/90 Elmarit, but it also costs a heck
of a lot less.
;-)

Feli


Replies: Reply from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] If You Absolutely Loved Your 1970 Vintage 105 Nikkor, Raise Your Hand!)
Reply from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Leica Ig?)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Lenses without digital Bodies, Anyone?)