Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have the pre APO 90 Summicron and I know it was superior to that. And frankly, any 90 good or better 90 that mounts on an SLR is, to my way of thinking, better than an excellent to world class 90 that mounts on an M - I want to see the subject through the 90, not through a little frame in a picture window. But that's just me. B. D. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Emanuel Lowi Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 4:26 PM To: lug@leica-users.org Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikkor 105 2.5 B. D. Colen wrote: > > Yup - It is a killer ;-) > It may or may not be equalled or bettered by either of the current Leica M 90mm lenses. And it IS a little dust prone. :-( But @ $250 per, who cares? I'll keep my Nikkor 105/2.5 AIS forever, while I have no more Leica M 90s. Emanuel Lowi Montreal ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information