Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] BD's article
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Thu Sep 16 09:11:47 2004
 
It was nonsense, Ted.  A mere satire to point out what you state below.

> From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:08:22 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] BD's article
> 
> Philippe Orlent offered this in response to a:
> 
> BD comment: "...so I can't complain, God knows.... ;-)"
> 
> Philippe    >>>>> Is it appropriate to mention these matters on the LUG?
> :P<<<<<<<<<,
> 
> Oh jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssuuuuuuuussssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> BULL SH...................T!!
> 
> Why do some of you people turn simple every day meaningless comments into
> some kind of political or religious statement. May the Great Spirit have
> mercy on your ...... whatever!
> 
> Now play nonsense with that one!
> 
> ted
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] Text Available for B.D.'s Article)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] BD's article...... an apology)
 In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] BD's article)