Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Fri Oct 22 19:02:58 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20041022205030.0088cd00@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
 
Why?   Because I own a 90 (and a 135 FWIW) and I'd like to be able to use
it on future digital rangefinders, even it it becomes a 135/2.

-dan c.

At 09:17 PM 22-10-04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote:
>Why not? Or, more to the point - why? It would be a 135 with no finder
>magnification, and with a shorter rangefinder base than you have on an
>M.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Dan C
>Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 8:51 PM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US
>
>
>Can a 90 be used with the RD-1?
>
>-dan c.
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US)
 In reply to: Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US)