Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More signs of the Digital Age
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Tue Nov 9 23:57:23 2004
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNGEJHAJAB.red735i@earthlink.net>

I have met people who assume there is a "natural" print resolution of 
300dpi. They quote print sizes this way, stupid but true.
Frank

On 10 Nov, 2004, at 02:58, Frank Filippone wrote:

> So I go to my local camera store to buy some film.  This store has 
> been in
> business for a good 40 years, under the same family .   While there, I
> inquire about scanning my rolls and placing them on a CD rather than 
> cheapo
> prints.  Fine. Low res scans for a roll are roughly $12 including film
> processing.
> (Then I get stupid.)
> They also process and scan 6x6 120 film, but only Hi res scans.
> (Now I get REALLY stupid.)
> So what are the file sizes for a hi res scan? ( I ask the lovely lady 
> at the
> counter.)  She responds with the following....
>
> 30x40 Print size.
>
> What the $%#$** was I told?  How can a person translate from print 
> size to
> file size?  What about the invented pixels, are they included?
>
> I'm very confused........
>
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jorg.willems at pp.inet.fi (Jorg Willems) ([Leica] More signs of the Digital Age)
Reply from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] More signs of the Digital Age)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] More signs of the Digital Age)