Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard, It seems a bit noisier than my Fuji Neopan 1600 images, and certainly noisier than the images I now shoot with the Canon 20D at ISO 1600. But there are so many variables involved--for example, how much did you have to bring up the shadow, and did you do it in Photoshop or during the RAW conversion? I find that any significant corrections in Photoshop at these speeds (as opposed to during RAW conversion) result in too much noise, both with scanned film and digital capture. Nathan Richard wrote: > http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/EPSN0298_BW.jpg > ASA1600, converted using Epson PhotoRAW > > It has quite a bit of digital noise, from both using ASA1600, USM, and > bringing up the shadow to see the faces in the background. For people > that are used to shoot B&W, does the noise look worse than B&W film shot > at ASA1600? > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, > please use richard at imagecraft.com) > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com