Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Wed Dec 15 11:19:51 2004
References: <8d.1c47a6d0.2ef1cfec@aol.com>

So what is this image about and what?s going on there? Only instantaneous 
answers, please.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <SonC@aol.com>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism


> Madison:   http://www.leica-gallery.net/wccjr/image-46065.html
> -----------------------------------------
>
> In  a message dated 12/15/2004 11:30:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> bdcolen@MIT.EDU  writes:
> Richard Taylor observed that the Gladwell New Yorker article while
> interesting,
> had nothing to tell us about "Leica photography" because, after  all, 
> unless a
> photo is an abstract, we can look at it and instantly know what  it's 
> about
> and what's going on...Which leads me to  observe....
>


Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism)