Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]UNDER 2K, Dan, UNDER 2K - And someone just contacted me off list to say they've recently seen two M3s, recently overhauled by Sherry K, that were in the mint- to mint category and were selling for about 1K. No, I wouldn't spend that on a 50-year-old camera. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Dan C Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:34 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica MP Classic There are many people who would consider paying $2500 for a 50mm lens, or $2700 for a plain Jane MP or M7 to be equally foolish. $2000 for a 50 year old M3? That's considered sane? Different strokes for different folks. -dan c. At 10:52 AM 21-12-04 -0500, B. D. Colen wrote: >These days you could get a mint-, if not mint M3 for under $2K - Why >not by the real, real thing? :-) > >-----Original Message----- >From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of >Frank Filippone >Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 10:40 AM >To: Leica Users Group >Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica MP Classic > > >Would it be cheaper to buy a real, original issue, MP then this thing? > >There is no accounting for taste.... and apparently for man's >stupidity. ( PT Barnum?) > >Frank Filippone >red735i@earthlink.net > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information