Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sun Dec 26 08:52:10 2004
References: <440b792d0412220843f7c9947@mail.gmail.com> <028701c4e84f$ebf949a0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <440b792d0412221040330de195@mail.gmail.com> <24a69ff1041226075367c86714@mail.gmail.com>
 
in every market, you have to establish yourself, the M mount is not
the same as current ziess market ( digital P&S and etc...).  rollie
already came and gone!!


On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:53:03 -0800, Richard Sintchak <rich815@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:40:28 -0800, mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > B.D, even though ziess has been around for a long time, they are a new
> > comer in this format (M)
> 
> Why does the mount matter?
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad
In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from rich815 at gmail.com (Richard Sintchak) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)