Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica glass on 20D (was Re: FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.)
From: nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue Jan 4 10:29:57 2005
References: <24B94B6A-4F79-11D9-8680-003065B8976C@ucalgary.ca> <A33DAFAE-5269-11D9-9ADF-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <41C7A8FE.8030007@planet.nl> <45275AF0-5350-11D9-9BD0-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <002901c4e770$274938c0$87d86c18@ted> <7597B881-53A4-11D9-9BD0-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <001101c4ea05$514d1a00$87d86c18@ted> <lrets0hrm0ap319phf9a8pcppg8t0dcafg@4ax.com>

Eric,

During the next couple of days I will be posting my week 52 and week 1 
PAWs, from my vacation in Poland. I have not made the selection yet, but 
I have a strong feeling that a couple of shots I took with the 20D and 
100mm Apo Macro will be there. I do not have a 100mm Canon lens, but I 
do have the excellent 85mm 1.8. The images taken with the Leica lens 
stand out clearly--and that was even the case on a notebook screen, with 
RAW images.

I do not use a tripod. In terms of resolution, I am sure the Canon lens 
   delivers the same as the Leica lens when I shoot hand-held. But there 
are other attributes to an images: the color rendition, overall clarity, 
  (dare I say it) bokeh, and just the overall look. The images in 
question elicited a WOW from a friend I was showing them to on the 
computer, and she had no idea which lens was used for which picture.

After shooting digital now for 6 months, I have concluded that great 
glass remains great glass, whether the photons end up on film or on a 
sensor.

Nathan

Eric wrote:

> Ted:
> 
> 
>>Certainly when so many say.."Well it's the lens 
>>that counts the most with any Leica camera anyway!"
> 
> 
> Has anybody done a comparison between the best Canon lenses on the 20D vs.
> Leica glass?
> 
> Looking at negatives and prints made the old fashioned way, I can tell the
> difference from my own equipment.  Once I scan a negative at 4000 dpi, I 
> can
> no longer tell the difference in terms of resolution between normal to
> moderate telephoto lenses.
> 
> On the other hand, Leica wide angles are better than Canon's in terms of
> less distortion.  Canon's wide angles are their weakest lenses, from what I
> can tell.
> 
> I was reading a thread the other day where somebody was comparing a $100
> Canon 50mm to a $1000 Leica 50mm.  Somebody else asked, "But did you use a
> tripod?"  Well, the tripod use really doesn't matter if you rarely use a
> tripod.  I'm wondering the same thing about digital capture.
> 
> --
> Eric
> http://canid.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com