Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Jan 16 09:48:02 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACCEPJCGAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <p06200704be0ed3a4cbce@[131.142.12.152]> <000e01c4fb18$a79d7e80$42ec4142@D1S9FY41> <02DDFCD2-671C-11D9-979F-000A95DD7D76@charter.net>
 
I've used the 50/2.8 quite often. Don't know why. Because it's small, I
guess.

It figures in at least three PAW's last year:

http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/1.html
http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/2.html
http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/44.html

I like it enough to consider getting the new version and off-load the old
one.

Then again ... I'm starting to get partial to Leica's 1.4 offerings ...
(not the new Summilux though. It's probably great, but I can't afford it.)

Daniel

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:

> The Elmar-M is adequate at any aperture. Judging from what's been shown
> on the list as examples, those images for the most part suffer from
> camera motion and poor post production adjustments.
> S. Dimitrov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
 In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)