Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Mon Jan 24 06:24:04 2005
References: <000501c5016f$001f0e00$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <41F4F453.7080408@adrenaline.com> <41F4FDAC.3070205@gmx.de>

>[...] what Leica needs to do is make a basic M style chassis with modular
>digital components which can be updated or upgraded whenever the user or 
>advances in technology demand it [...]
>Douglas

>If that is technically feasible, I thinks that's a superb concept for a 
>high end
>digi-M body [...]
>Scott

Technically feasible? Maybe, if size and weight do not matter. But I'm not 
shure if this would work with a M. For me, M stands for a certain 
compactness. If the digital compents should be modular, you can be shure 
the camera would not be optimizeable in size and weight.

And as there is already a "hunchback of Solms" (R8/9), so there is no need 
for another monster ("the incredible Hulk of Solms"?):-)

I think we can be happy if we get a non modular digital M with a 1.5 
cropfactor sensor within one year and a half. If Leica is still alive until 
then.

Didier


Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas M.Sharp) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas M.Sharp) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)