Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 122
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Feb 1 11:41:38 2005
References: <r01050300-0921-8911EF81745011D9811108CF11706D62@[66.239.168.91]> <008e01c50895$1056a3f0$3201a8c0@AUG01>

Or use Fujicolor (the 4th layer stuff). Works great in a lot of different
lighting. I think Kodak Supra did too. But Kodak is a moving target. It's
probably called something else now.

Daniel

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Ruben wrote:

> George - I like the way you follow a critique with a solution to the
> problem - a good way of dealing with this is carying a blue fliter in your
> pocket -( never can remember the filter number) but it is easier than to
> have to correct it in photoshop afterwards - ruben
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Lottermoser" <george@imagist.com>
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:55 PM
> Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 122
>
>
> >> Dear LUG,
> >>   Attached is PAW 4 - 2005.  This was shot at the Cafe Amelie, in
> >> Paris.  This man was eating his lunch and reading.  I was struck with
> >> the colors.  I hope someone enjoys.  Comments appreciated.
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Lee-Hermann-album/at_lunch
> >
> > I can't help asking - what colors were you struck by? The colors your 
> > eyes
> > saw in the scene or the extreme distortion of color that you chose to 
> > show
> > on screen?
> >
> > I'm constantly amazed by folks who post color images which have 
> > absolutely
> > no relationship to what their eyes see. I'm not a purist about the point.
> > I'm open to radical color if done with some intentionality or on purpose.
> > But I don't understand taking 5000K daylight film into 2800K situations
> > and not taking care of the difference when we've got the software to deal
> > with it. Did you intend to have such an off-color effect?
> >
> > I've taken the liberty to adjust your color and posted it here
> > <http://www.imagist.com/colors/> while certainly still not perfect, I 
> > have
> > to assume it more closely relates to what you saw.
> >
> > Fond regards,
> >
> > G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagist?
> >
> > <*>Peace<*>   <*>Harmony<*>  <*>Stewardship<*>
> >
> > Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
> >                                     since 1969
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > web                              <www.imagist.com>
> > eMail                        george@imagist.com
> > voice                              262 241 9375
> > fax                                262 241 9398
> >                      Lotter Moser & Associates
> > 10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 122)
Message from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 122)