Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Feb 8 01:01:07 2005
References: <04b301c50d22$2d9907a0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <62893A06-7917-11D9-909F-0003936C5BDE@pix-that-stimulate.com> <000901c50d28$0b1d4e10$833b6d18@ted>

You might find you can't always try all alternatives, and somethings 
have no choice ;-0

On 08/02/2005, at 2:16 AM, Ted Grant wrote:

> Tarek Charara said in answer to a B.D. post:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200
>
>
>
>> Le 7 f?vr. 2005, ? 15:34, B. D. Colen a ?crit :
>>
>>> Would you - a. rather see the image through a brilliant viewfinder, 
>>> and
>>> end up with a crappy image because film is simply not up to capturing
>>> enough detail in the low light ? - or would you - b. rather 
>>> compromise
>>> on the image seen through the viewfinder and end up with a 
>>> high-quality
>>> image?
>
> Tarek Charara
>> This is like the penis question: Would you rather have a small hard 
>> one or a big soft one? I'll go with a brilliant viewfinder and a high 
>> quality image! ;?)<<<,,
>
> Ah sooo Tarek,
>
> But this begs the immediate question  ......... "Have you ever used a 
> 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200 or 20D at the 3200 ASA setting and made 12"X18" 
> prints? And yes with cropping where necessary?
>
> If not, then your comment about penis and print size is meaningless. 
> ;-)
> ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Alastair



In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] 1Ds Mk II at ISO 3200)