Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Infared or radio
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Wed Feb 16 21:09:00 2005
References: <000301c5149e$3a843ba0$6501a8c0@dorysrusp4> <53EA873855A3E51C28E8F37A@hindolveston.reid.org>

even the IR release on my Rollei QZT is unreliable at "meters". Cute 
idea however, putting the release in the lens cap ;-)

On 17/02/2005, at 4:07 PM, Brian Reid wrote:

>
>> For distance work, especially in a photographer rich environment, 
>> radio
>> is the way to go.
>
> For portrait work in a studio, radio is the way to go.
>
> Despite the ubiquitous IR gizmos (which no one uses) on every phone 
> and laptop, current IR technology is best used for thawing frozen 
> vegetables, not controlling mechanized devices.
>
> I was a decade ago the manager of an engineering design group that got 
> 6 patents on infrared devices, and have bought entirely too many IR 
> products from K&S or B&H in the naive hope that they might work. They 
> are not reliable. I can explain why to anyone who will let me say it 
> in EE language.
>
> I use only PocketWizard RF products, and wouldn't consider 
> recommending any other kind. The PocketWizard Plus is simplicity 
> itself--you don't even have to read the manual--and the PocketWizard 
> MultiMAX could probably launch an ICBM.
>
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Alastair


In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] OT: Infared or radio)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] OT: Infared or radio)