Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A question for Ted, 135 lens
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Mon Feb 21 20:50:47 2005
References: <022120051706.21060.421A14FF00037A57000052442207000953040C02019C990E04@comcast.net> <2be879e4009b81dd5c1992560cd8602e@shaw.ca> <006101c51871$efddf8c0$833b6d18@ted> <e686e4fef3c4d9fa913e10f3f9b74fb9@shaw.ca>

John Collier said:

>I completely agree with you Ted but I do not carry two camera systems 
>anymore. So a 135 in the pocket is handy sometimes though, as you point 
>out, it is not the ideal solution.<<<,,

John,
Of course if one is locked into one camera model obviously one learns to 
make the 135 on an M work. My good fortune is I don't have to and prefer to 
use the R8 for anything longer than say the 60mm.

ted



In reply to: Message from mcyclwritr at comcast.net (mcyclwritr@comcast.net) ([Leica] A question for Ted, our God of Speed.)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] A question for Ted, our God of Speed.)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] A question for Ted, 135 lens)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] A question for Ted, 135 lens)