Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Jammed EI 6400
From: heintz at ucalgary.ca (John W. Heintz)
Date: Sun Mar 6 22:18:04 2005
References: <200503061455.j26EtGrA074899@server1.waverley.reid.org>

On 6 Mar 2005, at 07:55, Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> 
wrote:
> So I used digital. I still didn't want to use a flash so I set the
> exposure index at what Nikon calls "HI-2". That's two stops less than 
> ISO
> 1600, or in other words EI 6400. I've never even bothered to try film 
> at
> 6400. It just won't cut it. Just too contrasty.
>

>  I converted to a gamma 2.2 grey
> profile (went from sRGB -> 2.2 gamma grey profile). .... It more or
> less confirms, even with an amateur attempt, that digital is better 
> than
> film in low-light. This coming from someone other than the usual group 
> who
> has always said this.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Louice-jam-sessions/DSC_0828g
>
> I'll be using film as steadily as before, but if I ever really, really
> need EI 6400, I know what I'll do.
>
> I'm curious as to what others think.
>
> Best,
> Daniel

All right, Daniel, you've convinced me: for that low light, I've gotta 
use digital.
Which Nikon did you use?

Here's my latest jazz in the dark:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/johnny


john


Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Jammed EI 6400)