Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:R lenses and variable apertures
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Thu Mar 17 04:31:46 2005
References: <BE5DD4A2.1FD18%telyt@earthlink.net> <4238ACC3.6040409@edd.uio.no>

Why do so many of us use intemperate language here that we would not dream 
of using in front of our small children - or our friends at a dinner party? 
I'm tired of it.

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:R lenses and variable apertures


> Doug,
> You said something to the effect that Leica lenses at full aperture are, 
> in contrast to the competition, usuable at full aperture. That implies 
> that you think the competitions lenses are unusable at full aperture, 
> which is unqualified bullshit.
>
> Daniel
>
>>
>> Felix, it was Daniel who made the 'unusable' remark.  Perhaps you should
>> address this comment to him.  I didn't write anythign about 'unusable'.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Re:R lenses and variable apertures)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re:R lenses and variable apertures)